Home
About
Journals
My QOAM
QOAMcorners
(Re)make QOAMcorners
Browse QOAMcorners
Profiles
Contact
Log in
Register
About
Contact
FAQ
Journal Score Card
Organisation
References
Tools
References
Links
The best of both worlds
.
Jan Velterop
New tool assessing academic journals. FWF Austrian Science Fund
New tool assessing academic journals. Lithuanian Research Library Consortium
Dutch National Open Access website
Open Access Publishing Services
As Open Access Explodes, How to Tell the Good From the Bad and the Ugly?
Martin Enserink
Publications
QOAM’s journal composition.
Maurits van der Graaf
, member Advisory Board QOAM.
Quantitative analysis of QOAM’s journal list in terms of journal types and publisher size.
A publisher publishes an article. At what price?
Leo Waaijers
Experiences with the offsetting deals in the Netherlands.
Two market places for academic journals compared: QOAM and Journal Browser.
Leo Waaijers.
A concise comparison of the new Dutch market place Journal Browser and QOAM.
QOAM sustainability plan
.
Pleiade Management and Consultancy BV
An international expert workshop was held to discuss the possibilities for an economic model to sustain QOAM – Quality Open Access Marker.
Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
.
Jelte Wicherts
The transparency of a journals web site about the peer-review process predicts academic quality in new journals. QOAM measures this transparency via its Base Score Card.
Quality Open Access Marker and Other Initiatives: A Comparative Analysis
Danielle van Gerestein.
The article compares QOAM to the following initiatives:
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
JournalReviewer
SciRev
Journalysis
JournalGuide
PRE-val
Eigenfactor.org
Methods to stop predatory journals.
Margot Wehrmeijer.
This thesis looks at three possible methods to stop predatory journals: black- and white-lists, open peer review systems and new metrics.